That last one may have been a false alarm, but the buffer overflow bug is 100% real -- you can try it very easily. ------- Forwarded Message From: Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net> Message-Id: <199509220836.EAA14476@clark.net> Subject: Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE! To: rjc@clark.net (Ray Cromwell) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 04:36:56 -0400 (EDT) Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com In-Reply-To: <199509220830.EAA13828@clark.net> from "Ray Cromwell" at Sep 22, 95 04:30:03 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha3] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 521 Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com Precedence: bulk X-UIDL: 811769872.045 Disregard that last message. Those drugs I was taking must have just kicked in. I was running another program in the background which coincidentally brought up an xterm at the same time I clicked on the link. Damn, and I thought I had found another bug. Ah well. There's probably one lurking there somewhere. It was good while it lasted. When I hit "send" and that xterm popped up, I almost jumped out of my seat. ;-) Remember this lesson, you should always try to repeat your bugs atleast three times. ;-) - -Ray ------- End of Forwarded Message